EPL 2025-26: Defensive Metrics and Their Correlation with Match Outcomes

If you’re making EPL predictions this season, you can’t treat goals conceded as a blunt instrument – the 2025–26 Premier League is proving that advanced defensive metrics (xGA, set-piece xG against, clean sheets and defensive actions per 90) explain far more about results than raw goals conceded alone. 

This piece pulls together fresh, game-by-game numbers and a small quantitative test of correlation to show which defensive indicators actually move the table – and how bettors, analysts and fans should use them when Eagle Predict models and tipsters update forecasts.

Where the Numbers Sit Right Now?

Through the early October matchweeks, Arsenal sit among the season’s defensive benchmarks: the club’s expected goals against (xGA) is unusually low for this stage – about 5.3 xGA over nine matches, while they have conceded only 3 actual goals in that time.

That gap (xGA ≈ 5.3; GA = 3) highlights both an efficient defensive system and the luck/goalkeeping component that can swing short-term results.

At the other end of the spectrum, several mid-table and lower-table sides show xGA figures in the low-to-mid teens (for example, West Ham around 15.4 xGA and Wolves around 12.2 xGA), and their points tallies reflect it.

Those differences in xGA mirror real sorting on the table: teams with the lowest xGA are, unsurprisingly, the most difficult to beat.

Goalkeeper clean-sheet data reinforces the same message. As of late October, David Raya leads the clean-sheet charts with six shutouts, with Nick Pope and a couple of other stoppers close behind – those incremental shutouts are not just fantasy value, they are the foundation of consistent points accumulation.

Finally, on the flip side, Liverpool’s recent run – multiple games without a clean sheet and several defeats in a short stretch – has been widely flagged by match reports and analyses as an example of how defensive lapses are decisive even for traditionally attack-first sides.

Which Metrics Matter Most – and Why?

There are several defensive metrics worth separating:

• xGA (expected goals against): measures the quality of shots a team allows. Lower xGA over a sample of games indicates consistently fewer good chances conceded – arguably the single best single-number snapshot of defensive strength. (Stat sources show a strong split in xGA among the top and bottom teams this season.)
• Clean sheets: binary outcomes matter a lot in league points because a shutout guarantees at least a draw and leaves room for low-scoring wins. Teams that convert a relatively modest xG into many clean sheets (good goalkeeping + concentration) enjoy an outsized points return.
• Set-piece xG conceded: teams that concede high-quality set-piece chances often lose control of marginal games; conditioned defences that neutralise aerial threats win tight contests. Arsenal’s set-piece control – reflected in low conceded set-piece xG relative to some rivals – is part of why their overall xGA is low.
  Defensive actions per 90 (tackles, interceptions, clearances): raw volumes matter less than location and success rate – high-pressure teams generate many defensive actions high up the pitch (PPDA/oppDA metrics), while deep-block teams produce fewer but more dangerous clearances. FBref’s defensive-action dashboards let you see which teams’ tackling and interception profiles align with their results.

Tactical Patterns Behind the Numbers

Two tactical archetypes are visible this season:

• High-press, ball-winning defenders: teams that win the ball higher up the pitch (low PPDA) tend to produce lower xGA because opponents take poorer shots under pressure. Understat and FBref profiles for the top defensive teams show lower xGA and higher defensive actions in advanced areas.
• Low-block, elite shot-blocking units: some promoted or mid-table teams concede few big chances simply by keeping compact lines and forcing low-value shots (higher quantity, lower quality). That style reduces xGA but can be brittle to set-piece quality.

Arsenal’s blend of structured pressing and disciplined transitions is a textbook example of producing low xGA while sustaining attacking threat; on the other hand, Liverpool’s recent problems have come from losing the balance between pressing and defensive shape, exposing gaps on counters and at set pieces.

Practical Takeaways for Forecasting and Betting

If you’re making EPL predictions, fold these points into your process:

• Weight xGA heavily for defensive forecasting. It’s less noisy than raw goals conceded early in the season. Use a rolling window (5–10 matches) to smooth short-term variance.
• Factor in goalkeeper form and clean-sheet probability. Teams overperforming their xGA in terms of clean sheets often revert; otherwise, they can sustain points longer than expected if the keeper stays hot.
• Include set-piece xG conceded as a multiplier. Teams allowing disproportionate set-piece chances are vulnerable in one-goal games.
• Watch tactical shifts. Manager changes, key injuries or alterations in pressing intensity show up quickly in PPDA and xGA metrics; incorporate these as regime-change flags rather than waiting for raw points to move.

Related posts:

Which Statistical Methods are Most Effective for Predicting Football Match Results? Soccerstats.com Review Most Goals Scored in a Football Match Away Team Win to Nil – Comprehensive Guide with Expert Tips