Big Race Bookie Busters – Results Update
I just wanted to give a quick update on our trial of Big Race Bookie Busters here at Honest Betting Reviews.
It is just over two months into our trial and the performance so far has been fantastic.
Welcome to the Honest Betting Reviews blog. Here you can find the latest updates on betting systems and tipsters currently under review as well as our tips on how to beat the bookies with the best winning betting systems we have profited from,
I just wanted to give a quick update on our trial of Big Race Bookie Busters here at Honest Betting Reviews.
It is just over two months into our trial and the performance so far has been fantastic.
We are two months into our trial of Quentin Franks Racing so thought it would be a good time for a results update.
We are two months into our review of Elliott’s Sports Analysis from renowned tipster Keith Elliott.
The service focuses mainly on golf, which is where Keith has built his reputation as a formidable tipster over the years, also publishing a number of books on golf betting.
The bookies have priced up the French Open and it’s quite astonishing to see Rafael Nadal priced up as the second favourite, being as high as 9/2 with Paddy Power.
The Spaniard has won an incredible 9 French Open titles, an all time record and one which will perhaps never be beaten.
Nadal’s only ever loss at the tournament since he first played it way back in 2005 came to Robin Soderling at the 2009 event. His record on the clay at Roland Garros is an almost unfathomable 66-1.
The draw has not been kind to the undisputed “King of Clay” this year however, with Rafa due to meet world number one Novak Djokovic in the quarter finals, followed by a potential semi-final with Andy Murray, who he recently lost to in the final of Madrid in straight sets.
The Spaniard has also been on poor form this year, yet to win on clay for the first time in his career.
The bookies have priced Djokovic as the odds-on favourite at a best priced 10/11, also with Paddy Power.
The Serbian has looked imperious this season but is yet to win at Roland Garros and may well have to beat the other three members of the “big four” – Nadal, Murray and Federer – if he is take the title.
I strongly suspect Djokovic will trade higher at some stage of the tournament and am not
particularly keen to back him now at odds-on.
A much better selection would seem to be Roger Federer, who has a very kind draw having avoided the other members of the “big four” in his half of the draw.
Before last week’s Rome final, Barry Cowan was absolutely incredulous on Sky Sports that Federer was priced up at 20/1 for the title, at higher odds even than Kei Nishikori, a man without a single grand slam title to his name.
I had an interest there and would not put people off backing the Swiss maestro at 12/1.
Federer is remarkably consistent in grand slams and if he makes it to the latter stages, his price will be a fraction of its current level, presenting a great trading opportunity.
If he makes it to the final to face one of the other big four, he will probably be around the 2/1 to 3/1 mark, although if he is against Murray expect the odds to be closer to evens.
Whatever happens this week, one thing is for sure – this is the most open looking French Open since Nadal first set foot on the clay of Roland Garros ten years ago.
Serena Williams starts as the 11/4 favourite for the women’s tournament at Roland Garros.
Whilst you cannot question the American’s incredible 19 grand slam wins, she has only won the French Open once since 2002. She seems to struggle on the slow surface in the French capital, having suffered an early round defeat in her last visit.
Much more at home on the faster surfaces of Wimbledon and the US Open, it does not appear great value backing Serena at 11/4.
However, the second favourite in the tournament is Maria Sharapova and the Russian seems to enjoy a greater affinity with the clay court surface than her rival at the top of the market. She has been to three finals in a row, winning the title in 2012 and 2014.
At a general 9/2 price, Sharapova seems to represent good value. At half the odds to make the final, an each-way bet would seem a sensible selection here.
The bookies have already opened up betting on who will be the next Man City manager, expecting as a matter of course that Manuel Pellegrini would be sacked at the end of the season following City’s failure to capture silverware this season. Read more
Well it was one hell of a weekend of betting and I don’t really know where to start!
Perhaps best to start with the election. I am still in the process of picking my jaw up off the floor. I
don’t think anyone was predicting a Tory majority. Certainly not the pollsters and so-called experts anyway. Even David Cameron seemed genuinely surprised. Read more
We are just over two months into our review of Big Race Bookie Busters and it has been a very good performance so far.
They are 130 points in profit at advised prices and 94 points in profit at Betfair SP, very much keeping up their form coming into the trial. Read more
It’s just over two months into our review of Master Racing Tipster so time for an update.
I am pleased to report that this service is doing well – it is just under 70 points in profit at advised prices and over 40 points profit at Betfair SP. Read more
With the General Election tomorrow we thought it would be a good time to cast our thoughts over the betting prospects for the politically-minded punter.
You might be thinking the value is all gone at this stage and on the whole you would be right. For instance, we backed no overall majority over a year ago at above evens and it is now around 1/7.
We also went with the Tories to win most seats at round evens and that is now 1/5.
However, whilst some of the value may have gone on the main markets, there are still opportunities to make a profit.
The question of who will form the next government is a thorny one. Much of the press is working itself into a lather about “legitimacy” saying the party that has the most seats should have the right to govern.
Well as much as this may be the case in theory, ultimately the situation comes down to being able to get a Queen’s speech passed. If you don’t have enough votes in Parliament to do this, you will lose and face reelection.
That would be a humiliating fate for whichever leader tried it, with no doubt dire repercussions for them personally and also their party.
So you can rest assured neither side will want to form a government unless they are confident they definitely have enough votes to get a Queen’s Speech through Parliament.
For Cameron, this means almost certainly another coalition with the Lib Dems will be needed. Clegg has strongly indicated in recent days that he would prefer another coalition with the Tories. If the Tories get between 285 and 290 seats, this is a real possibility as the maths will add up for them.
For Miliband, it seems highly unlikely that Labour will win outright, but combining SNP support with a few of the other smaller parties could well be enough. If Labour gets around 265-270 seats, this is a highly likely outcome.
But Miliband won’t go into coalition with the SNP for fear of the backlash in the rest of the UK.
So we are left with the two most likely options on the basis of current polling, which has the parties neck and neck: either another Tory/Lib Dem coalition or a Labour minority.
You can hedge these two positions nicely to guarantee a profit.
A Labour minority is available at 9/4 currently whilst a Tory/Lib Dem Coalition is priced at 5/2.
Final polling has the parties neck and neck or the Tories in a one point lead. There are now sophisticated tools that predict seat totals not just based on polls but on previous trends like the “shy Tory” factor and incumbency effect.
These tools give the Tories about 277 seats and yet you can get even money with Stan James that they will get less than 287.5 . This seems like a good bet to me. Many people are expecting the Tories to do better than the polls suggest, perhaps harping back to 1992. But modern polling has come on a lot since then and as I say, the general trends towards the Tories have been factored in by election prediction models.
Using the same models, Labour are predicted to get around 267 seats. You can get a general price of 5/6 that they will get between 251-275 seats, which seems a good bet to me. I would be surprised if they get more than 275 seats with the SNP predicted to do so well in Scotland.
Finally the Lib Dems are predicted to face disaster but recent constituency polling has showed them doing a little better than the national polls would predict. You can get 10/11 with Skybet that they got over 25 seats, which seems a good bet to me. I wouldn’t be surprised to see them with 28 -30 seats when all the votes are counted.
I also expect Clegg and Farage to win their respective seats. It looks like the Tories are going to come out in force to tactically vote for Clegg and Farage should just do enough to win UKIP’s biggest target seat.
You can get evens the Clegg/Farage double with William Hill.
Whatever happens it is due to be one of closest elections ever and should make for interesting viewing. Oh – and don’t forget to vote! 🙂
Strike rate refers to the rate at which a system or tipster wins. For example, if a tipster has 100 selections, 45 of which were winners, then that tipster would have a 45% strike rate.
There is no doubt that strike rate is one of the most important elements of a tipster or betting system. If a tipster has a high strike rate, it means they can grow a bank more quickly than one with a low strike rate, even if they both have the same return on investment.
This can be illustrated with an example:
Imagine one system that has a 50% strike rate – let’s call it system A and another one that has a 10% strike rate – let’s call it system B.
To be on the safe side, for system A you would probably want a 25 point bank, which would be 2.5 times the longest expected losing run of 10.
For the system B however, you would probably need a 165 point bank, which is 2.5 times the longest expected losing run of 66.
So imagine that you have £1,000 that you want to invest in a betting system.
For system A, you would divide the bank by 25 to give you £40 per point that you would bet.
For system B, you would divide the bank by 165 to give you £6 per point that you would bet.
Now let’s say each system has a return on investment of 20% and has 100 bets per month.
For system A, it would take you just over a month to double the bank.
For system B however, it would take you over 8 months to double the bank.
This is shown in the example below:
|
System A |
System B |
|
|
ROI: |
20% |
20% |
|
Strike rate: |
50% |
50% |
|
Bet Volume: |
100/month |
100/month |
|
Time to double bank: |
1.25 months |
8.3 months |
|
Bank after 1 year: |
£10,600 |
£2,440 |
So as you can see, after a year system A is up to over £10,000 where as system B is only on £2,440.
This illustrates that importance of strike rate to tipsters and betting systems.
It is also easier to cope when you have a high strike rate as it means more winning bets and shorter losing runs. Systems with low strike rates mean long losing runs and great patience is required to handle them. More often than not you will see people giving up when a long losing run is hit.
So I hope from this article you have seen the importance of strike rate and how crucial it is to take into account when considering a tipster or betting system.
Our mission is to weed out the scams, bogus sites, poor tipsters and downright garbage that is out there so you don’t waste any of your hard-earned cash on these.
We want to separate the “wheat from the chaff” as it were.
Honest Betting Reviews
C.O. Suite, 124 City Road
London EC1V 2NX
